<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LandlordMax Size and Complexity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.followsteph.com/2006/06/21/landlordmax-size-and-complexity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2006/06/21/landlordmax-size-and-complexity/</link>
	<description>Follow Steph through his real estate and business journeys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:02:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FollowSteph.com &#187; Lines of Code Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2006/06/21/landlordmax-size-and-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>FollowSteph.com &#187; Lines of Code Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/2006/06/21/landlordmax-size-and-complexity/#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes, I know lines of code (LOC) is not a very good metric for measuring complexity of software, growth, etc., however it&#8217;s still the only real metric I have easily available right now. That being said, since I last posted about this in June comparing the differences in lines of code between the four major releases then, I figured it was only appropriate that I do the same again for this release, our 5th major release of LandlordMax (version 3.11a). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes, I know lines of code (LOC) is not a very good metric for measuring complexity of software, growth, etc., however it&#8217;s still the only real metric I have easily available right now. That being said, since I last posted about this in June comparing the differences in lines of code between the four major releases then, I figured it was only appropriate that I do the same again for this release, our 5th major release of LandlordMax (version 3.11a). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FollowSteph.com &#187; How Much Effort is There in Each Software Update?</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2006/06/21/landlordmax-size-and-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>FollowSteph.com &#187; How Much Effort is There in Each Software Update?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/2006/06/21/landlordmax-size-and-complexity/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>[...] I just took a look at all the updates we released for LandlordMax Property Management Software version 2.12, which is now at version 2.12e, and it was quite lengthy as you can clearly see from this list of new features and fixes for each update. What&#8217;s the best metric to show how much effort was involved? That&#8217;s very debatable. One could argue LOC (Lines of Code) but that&#8217;s very skewed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just took a look at all the updates we released for LandlordMax Property Management Software version 2.12, which is now at version 2.12e, and it was quite lengthy as you can clearly see from this list of new features and fixes for each update. What&#8217;s the best metric to show how much effort was involved? That&#8217;s very debatable. One could argue LOC (Lines of Code) but that&#8217;s very skewed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
