<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InBoxer &#8211; Email Spam Filter for Outlook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/</link>
	<description>Follow Steph through his real estate and business journeys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-96524</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/#comment-96524</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

I understand that antispam is built in assembler and takes almost no space, but how is it better than InBoxer? Being smaller and written in assembler doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s better, just that it&#039;s smaller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I understand that antispam is built in assembler and takes almost no space, but how is it better than InBoxer? Being smaller and written in assembler doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s better, just that it&#8217;s smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-96405</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/#comment-96405</guid>
		<description>Try AntiSpam, a ultra light spam filter

Created entirely in assembly language (yes, only 88Kb!)

Protect unlimited number of pop3 email addresses (gmail mail included)

Scan the mail header AND also a number of lines from the mail body

Can check all hosts found in the mail header against DNSBL (&quot;Real-time Blackhole List&quot;)

many other features...

home.deds.nl/~antispam/

AntiSpam uses UIDL extensively. This key feature is not present in many spam filters, wich can lead to wrong inbox operations with them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try AntiSpam, a ultra light spam filter</p>
<p>Created entirely in assembly language (yes, only 88Kb!)</p>
<p>Protect unlimited number of pop3 email addresses (gmail mail included)</p>
<p>Scan the mail header AND also a number of lines from the mail body</p>
<p>Can check all hosts found in the mail header against DNSBL (&#8220;Real-time Blackhole List&#8221;)</p>
<p>many other features&#8230;</p>
<p>home.deds.nl/~antispam/</p>
<p>AntiSpam uses UIDL extensively. This key feature is not present in many spam filters, wich can lead to wrong inbox operations with them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-42997</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/#comment-42997</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,

That&#039;s great news! For me personally, I just can&#039;t find myself hosting my company&#039;s emails on gmail. I can&#039;t explain it, but I just don&#039;t feel comfortable doing it. 

If it was just personal emails, or contracting, I think it would be ok. But for a corporate site I find it difficult... Of course that could just be me :)

In any case, it&#039;s great to hear that spam is no longer an issue for you, and that you&#039;ve found a working solution for you. What a difference it makes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s great news! For me personally, I just can&#8217;t find myself hosting my company&#8217;s emails on gmail. I can&#8217;t explain it, but I just don&#8217;t feel comfortable doing it. </p>
<p>If it was just personal emails, or contracting, I think it would be ok. But for a corporate site I find it difficult&#8230; Of course that could just be me <img src='http://www.followsteph.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In any case, it&#8217;s great to hear that spam is no longer an issue for you, and that you&#8217;ve found a working solution for you. What a difference it makes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-41801</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/2008/03/13/inboxer-email-spam-filter-for-outlook/#comment-41801</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s odd how these things slip out of mind. For me, Spam has been a solved problem for a number of years. It must be 2003/4 since I last used an email service that wasn&#039;t GMail based, all my domains that have email are hosted in the Google Apps. I sometimes use Outlook+IMAP to access the GMail backend, but it&#039;s GMail nonetheless. It&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve seen any spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s odd how these things slip out of mind. For me, Spam has been a solved problem for a number of years. It must be 2003/4 since I last used an email service that wasn&#8217;t GMail based, all my domains that have email are hosted in the Google Apps. I sometimes use Outlook+IMAP to access the GMail backend, but it&#8217;s GMail nonetheless. It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve seen any spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

