<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Design for ROI &#8211; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.followsteph.com/2008/05/12/web-design-for-roi-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/05/12/web-design-for-roi-review/</link>
	<description>Follow Steph through his real estate and business journeys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/05/12/web-design-for-roi-review/comment-page-1/#comment-46143</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/?p=462#comment-46143</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick,

It is a great book. You are correct that Call to Action didn&#039;t flow as well as Web Design for ROI. I just found that the information was more advanced (detailed) and immediately applicable in Call to Action. This one is great from an understanding perspective, it&#039;s just weaker in terms of an implementation perspective. But than that wasn&#039;t the book&#039;s goal, it was to teach you about the concepts and not get you overwhelmed and distracted in the details which I really appreciated!

I also absolutely agree with you on A/B and multivariate testing. I know it&#039;s something we&#039;re lacking here at LandlordMax ourselves. We do perform some testing, but not as much as I&#039;d like. With time I hope to increase this kind of testing, it really does make a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p>
<p>It is a great book. You are correct that Call to Action didn&#8217;t flow as well as Web Design for ROI. I just found that the information was more advanced (detailed) and immediately applicable in Call to Action. This one is great from an understanding perspective, it&#8217;s just weaker in terms of an implementation perspective. But than that wasn&#8217;t the book&#8217;s goal, it was to teach you about the concepts and not get you overwhelmed and distracted in the details which I really appreciated!</p>
<p>I also absolutely agree with you on A/B and multivariate testing. I know it&#8217;s something we&#8217;re lacking here at LandlordMax ourselves. We do perform some testing, but not as much as I&#8217;d like. With time I hope to increase this kind of testing, it really does make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hebb</title>
		<link>http://www.followsteph.com/2008/05/12/web-design-for-roi-review/comment-page-1/#comment-46094</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hebb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.followsteph.com/?p=462#comment-46094</guid>
		<description>I second the recommendation. It&#039;s a great book, and in fact I liked it a lot better than &quot;Call to Action&quot;, which I felt was a noncontiguous glob of teaser articles repackaged as a book.

I think the best usage of the book for more experienced web retailers would be to use some of the ideas as starting points for A/B or multivariate tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the recommendation. It&#8217;s a great book, and in fact I liked it a lot better than &#8220;Call to Action&#8221;, which I felt was a noncontiguous glob of teaser articles repackaged as a book.</p>
<p>I think the best usage of the book for more experienced web retailers would be to use some of the ideas as starting points for A/B or multivariate tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

